Important Expungement Supreme Court Decision

The Minnesota Supreme Court recently issued a decision impacting thousands of Minnesotans who sought to have a prior felony expunged from their record. In State v. S.A.M., the Court was tasked with determining whether a felony conviction, which was later reduced to a misdemeanor after the defendant successfully completed probation, should be treated as a felony or a misdemeanor for purposes of expungement in Minnesota.

In that case, S.A.M. was convicted of second-degree burglary. In Minnesota, second-degree burglary is a felony. S.A.M., however, received a stay of imposition of sentence. What that means is the judge found him guilty, placed him on probation, but did not impose a sentence. Under Minnesota law, a defendant’s felony conviction is reduced to a misdemeanor after they complete probation — assuming they received a stay of imposition. For that reason, a stay of imposition is generally seen as an excellent deal.

If a defendant wishes to have a conviction sealed (a process known as “expungement”), they must fit into one of the specific statutes found in Minnesota Statutes section 609A. One category states that any misdemeanor conviction is eligible for expungement two years following the discharge from probation. Another category states that you must wait five years for a felony, AND the felony needs to be one of the specifically listed felonies in the statute. In S.A.M.’s case, second-degree burglary was not one of the listed felonies. For that reason, he asked the court to view his conviction as a misdemeanor offense. After all, it had been reduced to a misdemeanor following his his successful completion of probation. Unfortunately, that argument was not persuasive enough, and the Minnesota Supreme Court determined that his conviction must be treated as a felony for purposes of expungement.

This decision is certainly a blow for those Minnesotans who received a stay of imposition and wished to seal their records. It is possible that the legislature will address this issue in the future, but as of right now, a felony conviction is always a felony — at least in the expungement arena.

There is also the possibility that an individual may receive a more limited expungement, even if they are ineligible for a complete statutory expungement. In some circumstances, the court may use its own inherent authority to seal the records located within the courts themselves. This will not affect records held by any other government agencies (e.g. BCA, local police department, prosecutors, etc.). However, an inherent authority expungement provide other benefits. If you are interested in learning more about whether you may be eligible for an expungement, please contact the attorneys at Leverson Budke, PLLP.

2 Comments on “IMPORTANT EXPUNGEMENT DECISION: A felony is, unfortunately, always a felony.

  1. Brit Myers

    So from what I gathered here is that even if a felony is not charged the same way they are always handled in the books the same way? Like no matter what your punishment, it goes on your records? I am trying to find out something for my friend and I would appreciate it if you could respond. I am not very good with law terms. Very thankful to have lawyers who are willing to share legal advice free though!

  2. Jonathan Hiatt

    By this same reasoning, is a gross misdemeanor always a gross misdemeanor? And, further, regarding multiple convictions: if a person is later charged with a misdemeanor 3 years, 9 months from discharge for GM offense, does that mean the gross misdemeanor offense can NEVER be expunged or does the clock start over if that person has been law abiding for over 13 years since a misdemeanor conviction?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Call for your Free Consultation (651) 829-3572